Several world leaders and senior diplomats have voiced measured caution regarding U.S. President Donald Trump’s initiative to establish a so-called “Board of Peace,” emphasising the need to safeguard the central role of the United Nations and existing multilateral mechanisms.

The proposal, advanced by the White House as part of broader peace and security ambitions, envisages a high-level council of global states working directly on mediation and conflict resolution.

Supporters within the United States frame it as an innovative approach to reviving stalled negotiations and offering an alternative forum for de-escalation in protracted conflicts.

Allied governments in Europe, Asia and Africa have acknowledged the potential value of additional diplomatic tools but have urged that any new platform complement — not supplant — the United Nations Security Council and existing regional organisations.

Officials in capitals from Brussels to Tokyo have underscored the importance of maintaining coherence in global governance, warning that parallel structures could inadvertently fragment international responses to crises.

Leaders have also reiterated their commitment to working with Washington on shared security priorities, even as they call for detailed consultations on the structure, mandate and membership of the proposed board.

At the United Nations, diplomats affirmed that the effectiveness of collective peace efforts depends on broad legitimacy and established legal frameworks, while expressing openness to innovative collaboration with the United States and other partners.

The discussion reflects broader debates among global policymakers about reforming international institutions to meet twenty-first-century challenges, including rising geopolitical tensions, climate-linked instability and humanitarian emergencies.

In advocating for vigilance and inclusivity, world leaders signal a desire to integrate new ideas with longstanding multilateral principles that have underpinned international cooperation for decades.