White House Refutes Reports That US Targeting Military Sites in Venezuela
Administration denies that forces have identified Venezuelan land targets, stressing any policy change would come directly from President Trump
The White House has publicly rejected recent media accounts suggesting that the Donald Trump administration has already chosen land-based military targets inside Venezuela for strikes.
A statement from White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said: “Unnamed sources don’t know what they’re talking about.
Any announcements regarding Venezuela policy would come directly from the President.”
Earlier reports, including from the The Wall Street Journal and the Miami Herald, said the administration had identified military installations used by the Venezuelan regime to traffic drugs and was considering strikes “in a matter of days or even hours.” One description suggested the campaign targeted facilities at the “nexus of the drug gangs and the Nicolás Maduro regime.”
President Trump, however, told reporters that a decision had not been made to strike targets inside Venezuela.
He reiterated that any move would be at his instruction and that no final plan is yet approved.
Meanwhile, U.S. naval assets including the USS Gerald R. Ford carrier have been redirected to the region under United States Southern Command oversight, prompting concern in Caracas.
President Maduro described the buildup as a “fabricated eternal war,” insisting the U.S. aims to undermine his government.
A senior fellow at the The Heritage Foundation observed the carrier’s arrival as adding operational options for the U.S., saying “the Ford’s air wing” will be in play if escalation follows—though the official stopped short of confirming an imminent invasion.
Reports note U.S. forces have already carried out multiple strikes against vessels alleged to be drug-trafficking, including one on 2 September that killed eleven individuals identified by the U.S. as members of the Venezuelan group Tren de Aragua.
Congressional oversight remains minimal.
A recent memo to lawmakers termed the U.S. campaign as a “non-international armed conflict” with foreign drug cartels—justifying strikes under war-time legal regimes.
Democratic lawmakers including Adam Schiff and Tim Kaine are pushing war-powers legislation to restrict further strikes without authorization.
In the meantime, White House officials emphasise that no formal operation against Venezuelan land targets has been green-lighted.
They state that policy announcements will come from President Trump, signaling that, for now, rhetoric and readiness are ahead of any confirmed military action.
A statement from White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said: “Unnamed sources don’t know what they’re talking about.
Any announcements regarding Venezuela policy would come directly from the President.”
Earlier reports, including from the The Wall Street Journal and the Miami Herald, said the administration had identified military installations used by the Venezuelan regime to traffic drugs and was considering strikes “in a matter of days or even hours.” One description suggested the campaign targeted facilities at the “nexus of the drug gangs and the Nicolás Maduro regime.”
President Trump, however, told reporters that a decision had not been made to strike targets inside Venezuela.
He reiterated that any move would be at his instruction and that no final plan is yet approved.
Meanwhile, U.S. naval assets including the USS Gerald R. Ford carrier have been redirected to the region under United States Southern Command oversight, prompting concern in Caracas.
President Maduro described the buildup as a “fabricated eternal war,” insisting the U.S. aims to undermine his government.
A senior fellow at the The Heritage Foundation observed the carrier’s arrival as adding operational options for the U.S., saying “the Ford’s air wing” will be in play if escalation follows—though the official stopped short of confirming an imminent invasion.
Reports note U.S. forces have already carried out multiple strikes against vessels alleged to be drug-trafficking, including one on 2 September that killed eleven individuals identified by the U.S. as members of the Venezuelan group Tren de Aragua.
Congressional oversight remains minimal.
A recent memo to lawmakers termed the U.S. campaign as a “non-international armed conflict” with foreign drug cartels—justifying strikes under war-time legal regimes.
Democratic lawmakers including Adam Schiff and Tim Kaine are pushing war-powers legislation to restrict further strikes without authorization.
In the meantime, White House officials emphasise that no formal operation against Venezuelan land targets has been green-lighted.
They state that policy announcements will come from President Trump, signaling that, for now, rhetoric and readiness are ahead of any confirmed military action.
AI Disclaimer: An advanced artificial intelligence (AI) system generated the content of this page on its own. This innovative technology conducts extensive research from a variety of reliable sources, performs rigorous fact-checking and verification, cleans up and balances biased or manipulated content, and presents a minimal factual summary that is just enough yet essential for you to function as an informed and educated citizen. Please keep in mind, however, that this system is an evolving technology, and as a result, the article may contain accidental inaccuracies or errors. We urge you to help us improve our site by reporting any inaccuracies you find using the "Contact Us" link at the bottom of this page. Your helpful feedback helps us improve our system and deliver more precise content. When you find an article of interest here, please look for the full and extensive coverage of this topic in traditional news sources, as they are written by professional journalists that we try to support, not replace. We appreciate your understanding and assistance.
